PRAIRIE FIELD NOTES / MONTANA

Bird Identification Using Size, Shape, Descriptions and Photos

How to identify a black or dark-looking prairie bird: build a regional candidate list, compare size and shape, record field notes, and read photo-app results as leads, not verdicts.

6 min readBirdwatching notebook1 viewsBird Identification Using Size, Shape, Descriptions and Photos
— · 0 votes
Contents
  1. Build a Candidate List for Your Place and Season
  2. Start With Relative Size
  3. Write the Observation Before Choosing a Name
  4. Compare Candidates Feature by Feature
  5. Using Descriptions, Charts and Pictures
  6. Photo Identifiers and Birding Apps
  7. When to Leave an Identification Unresolved

A useful list of black birds depends on where and when the bird was seen. "Black" is a field impression rather than a single bird group. Dark brown, glossy or iridescent birds can all look black, and almost any bird can look black against a bright sky or in deep shade. A list covering the whole country would mix species that never share the same marsh or field. For a sighting on the Montana prairie, such as around Medicine Lake, start with a Montana bird field guide or checklist, narrow it to the habitat and season, and then use the observations below to reduce that list to one or two candidates.

Build a Candidate List for Your Place and Season

  • Choose a regional source, such as a state field guide, rather than a national gallery of dark birds.
  • Filter by the setting where you saw the bird: open grassland, cropland, marsh edge, open water, shoreline or a farmyard.
  • Filter by time of year, because migrants and seasonal residents change which birds are realistic candidates.
  • Write down every remaining species that is black or can look black in the field. That shortlist is your working list of black birds.
  • Keep the list open until your observations rule candidates out. Do not shrink it to the first name that comes to mind.

Start With Relative Size

Size estimates in inches are unreliable at a distance, so many birders compare an unknown bird with familiar ones. A beginner sizing guide published by Feathered Guru describes the author's personal workflow. The author first judges whether a bird is closer in size to a House Sparrow, European Starling, American Robin or American Crow. Next comes the shape of the bill and body, and then how the bird moves. That sequence works well for dark birds, where color gives few clues and silhouette carries most of the information.

Record size as a comparison, such as "between robin and crow" or "starling-sized." Only convert it into inches if something of known size was beside the bird, such as a fence post you can measure later. An unscaled estimate written as a precise number creates false confidence.

Write the Observation Before Choosing a Name

Notes written before you open a guide are harder to bend toward a favorite answer. For a black or dark bird, record these features:

  • Relative size, and the bird or object you compared it with.
  • Silhouette: plump or slender, long- or short-necked, upright or horizontal posture.
  • Bill proportions: short and conical, long and slender, thick or hooked, and its length compared with the head.
  • Tail proportions: long or short, and its shape when spread or folded if you saw it.
  • Color placement: any color that breaks up the black, and exactly where it appears, such as the wing, head, eye or bill. Also note whether the black looked flat or glossy.
  • Movement: walking, hopping, wading, swimming, diving, perching on stems, or flight style.
  • Habitat: what the bird was standing on, perched in or flying over.

Compare Candidates Feature by Feature

Put each candidate from your shortlist in its own column. Mark every recorded feature as a match, a conflict or unknown. A single clear conflict can rule a candidate out. A column full of unknowns means you need a better view, not a better guess. The table below is an illustrative template using placeholder candidates, not real species.

Recorded featureCandidate ACandidate BCandidate C
Size between robin and crowMatchesMatchesConflicts
Short conical billMatchesMatchesUnknown
Color patch on wingMatchesMatchesConflicts
Tail shapeUnknownUnknownUnknown
Perched on marsh vegetationMatchesMatchesMatches

In this example, Candidate C is ruled out. A and B remain because the feature that separates them was not observed.

Using Descriptions, Charts and Pictures

Written descriptions and identification charts with pictures help most when they match your conditions. Check that the images show the right plumage for the bird you saw. Plumage is the set of feathers a bird has at a given stage, and it can differ between males and females, adults and young birds, and breeding and non-breeding seasons. A dark bird in one plumage may look brown, mottled or streaked in another. Also confirm that a chart covers your region. A chart of common backyard birds from elsewhere may omit the species you actually need to separate.

If you search by description, use your field notes as the search terms: size comparison, bill shape, color placement, behavior and habitat. "Black bird" alone returns too many possibilities to be useful.

Photo Identifiers and Birding Apps

Photo and sound identifiers, including free ones, are best treated as candidate generators. SmartBirds describes its own image results as candidate rankings, not expert verification. It also notes that an identifier can score well on familiar test images and still perform differently on real field photos. SmartBirds further explains that scores from BirdNET-style sound detectors are ranked outputs, not direct probabilities. A score of 0.9 does not mean a 90 percent chance the bird is that species. Use the top suggestions as additions to your candidate table, then check them against what your photo actually shows. Confirm an app's regional coverage, current features and any pricing directly with its provider before relying on it.

Dark birds are hard to photograph well because detail is easily lost in shadow or backlighting. Before trusting any suggestion, sort out what the image does and does not show with a simple worksheet:

Image | Clearly visible        | Hidden or unclear     | Candidates compared | Needs another view
------+------------------------+-----------------------+---------------------+--------------------------
IMG_1 | bill shape, posture    | eye color, tail shape | A, B                | tail from side or below
IMG_2 | wing patch, size vs.   | bill (turned away)    | A, B                | head in profile
      | nearby starling        |                       |                     |

The same notes help when you ask for help on a birding forum or community thread. Include the photo, the size comparison, the location, the date and the habitat, and say which features you could not see. Others can only rule out candidates based on what your evidence shows.

When to Leave an Identification Unresolved

Hypothetical example: candidates A and B share the body pattern you observed, but the tail feature that separates them was hidden. The careful record is "A or B, unresolved; tail not seen." Do not simply pick whichever name an app ranked higher. Noting the missing view tells you exactly what to look for next time, and it keeps your sightings record accurate. A confident wrong name is less useful than an honest pair of candidates.

Related articles